Operating model redesign – Liberate or Incapacitate, the choice is yours

ndetails

Companies are reorganising more frequently than ever before. It’s a natural consequence of a more dynamic market environment. But how can they manage the risks associated with changing structures and reorganising positions?

Most senior executives underestimate the disruption that a reorganisation can cause in their knowledge-based, white collar organisations. What may seem to be a simple change at the top of an organisation – a realignment of responsibility, or adding a new role – has huge consequences for processes and interfaces at lower levels, in particular for the middle management.

Management processes are the fabric of collaboration. They are institutional knowledge and rarely documented – it’s in the DNA – just the way things get done. With a proper appreciation for critical soft-factor processes, adequate time and resources can be allocated to a reorganisation process and figuring out the implications of a top-level change at lower levels before “go-live”.

Successful reorganisations require many difficult choices along two dimensions simultaneously. Decisions need to be cascaded hierarchically starting with the high level structure and working through the implications for sub-structures, then process/interfaces, roles, people and finally performance metrics for each level in affected units. The complexity of inter-related topics to cover sequentially by level and topic area, makes a successful reorganisation difficult to master. On top of this, speed is critical for minimising the risk of debilitating uncertainty in the organisation.

The best way to master the challenges is to execute the reorganisation in a well-structured set of working sessions that enable key decision makers to agree the right choices, at the right time and in the right sequence. The objective is not just speed, but to ensure that managers at all levels understand the practical implications of the new structure in their area and can work productively from day-one. By working out the important details on how the new operating model should work ahead of go-live with To-Be managers in the new set-up, the period of uncertainty and unclarity for employees can be reduced to zero. Go-live is a quiet “non-event”, rather than a confusing “big-bang”.

Done right, a reorganisation can be a liberating inflection point, releasing the potential of hungry rising stars in the organisation to grow value. Done poorly, it can be the starting gun for an exodus of top talent and decline. The choice is yours.

This article was originally published as the Humatica Corner in Real Deals magazine.

Related Insights

The Eight Types of AI Your Business Needs to Understand — and Why Treating Them as One is a Strategic Mistake
08 Jun, 2026 By Bryan Turner

The Eight Types of AI Your Business Needs to Understand — and Why Treating Them as One is a Strategic Mistake

One of the most persistent sources of confusion in business conversations about AI is the habit of treating ‘AI’ as a single, monolithic technology. It…

Read more arrowicon
Part II — Designing a Target Operating Model That Truly Enables Strategy
27 May, 2026 By Claudio Limacher

Part II — Designing a Target Operating Model That Truly Enables Strategy

This is the second article in a three-part series on designing and implementing a fit-for-purpose Target Operating Model. In Part I, we explored how to…

Read more arrowicon
The AI Reality Check: Cutting Through the Hype to What’s Actually Happening in Business
21 May, 2026 By Bryan Turner

The AI Reality Check: Cutting Through the Hype to What’s Actually Happening in Business

Ask ten business leaders how their AI transformation is progressing, and nine will tell you it’s going well. Ask their finance directors how much measurable…

Read more arrowicon