Finance is linear, organizations are not

Finance is linear, organizations are not

In private, talent operating partners are frustrated with investment teams lack of understanding about organizations. Likewise, investment managers are frustrated that they can’t find the right executive talent fast enough. Frictions have spiked with economic headwinds increasing pressure to deliver operational improvements.

These tensions are an inevitable aspect of the “Third Wave” in private equity, as the focus shifts from leverage and simple operational improvements to complex organizational drivers of value growth. Mutual understanding is the foundation for effective collaboration. And, understanding the root cause of the friction between deal and talent operating teams is a first step.

Deal makers are conditioned to analyse financially relevant hard-facts including revenues, costs and profit – making assumptions about these factors which are modelled in a discounted cash flow estimate of value. Although markets can achieve break-out growth, modelling financial performance is pretty simple. Cost-volume-profit models are inherently “linear” approximations, with fixed and variable costs driving profits based on sales volume. There are only few variables, and the relationships between them are linear.

The performance of organizational systems and people is NOT linear. The collective ability to make and execute the right decisions enables realization of the value creation plan. However, this process can be severely impaired by subtle organizational derailers that are impossible to pin-point from the board, or even by senior management.

There are a vast number of diverse enabling/disabling factors. And, organizations are only as good as their weakest link. So, a missing vision, poor CEO communications, micro-management in a key function, a lack of a CRM or thousands of other potential issues can cripple organizational performance and delay full-potential plan implementation. The relationship between org derailers (drivers) and performance is anything but linear.

We rely on CEO’s and leadership teams to manage their organizational systems, identify, and improve the weakest links. So it’s logical that when implementation starts to wobble, management is thrown out and new managers are brought in. But this is often “throwing the baby out with the bath water”. New management may not bring the competencies to resolve specific bottlenecks. And, there is always a delay and loss of knowledge when making a management change. It’s far less risky and faster to pin-point the specific derailers and help the existing management to resolve them.

Embracing organizational effectiveness as a value driver has great potential for private equity. However, realizing it will demand greater mutual understanding between deal teams and talent operating partners. Deal partners need to learn that organizational systems are far more complex than financial models a short checklist. And talent operating partners have to learn how to empirically connect diverse organizational performance drivers to valuation models.

This article was originally published as the Humatica Corner in Real Deals magazine.

Related Insights

Why 80% of AI Pilots Never Scale — and What the Successful 20% Do Differently
07 Oct, 2026 By Bryan Turner

Why 80% of AI Pilots Never Scale — and What the Successful 20% Do Differently

The AI pilot graveyard is large, and it is growing. Across the organisations we have worked with and the research we have reviewed, the pattern…

Read more
AI and Competitive Advantage: Why the Moat Is the Data, Not the Model
23 Sep, 2026 By Bryan Turner

AI and Competitive Advantage: Why the Moat Is the Data, Not the Model

Every board strategy conversation about AI now includes a version of the same question: how do we use AI to get ahead, rather than just…

Read more
AI Risk: The 10 Things Every Board Should Know (and Most Don’t)
01 Sep, 2026 By Bryan Turner

AI Risk: The 10 Things Every Board Should Know (and Most Don’t)

Corporate governance has always lagged behind the risks it is meant to manage. Boards develop oversight frameworks for risks after those risks have become embedded…

Read more